ARTICLE XXVII Board of Appeals | |||||||
§ 267. Membership; rules of procedure; powers and duties.
| |||||||
A. There shall be a Board of Appeals consisting of seven members appointed by the Town Board.
| |||||||
B. Such Board of Appeals shall, consistent with the Town Law, determine its own rules and procedure governing, among other things, the manner of bringing on appeals and applications for hearing, the notice to be given of its hearings in addition to statutory requirements, and the date and time of hearings and decisions.
| |||||||
C. The Board of Appeals shall investigate and report upon all matters referred to it by the Town Board.
| |||||||
D. The Board of Appeals shall have the powers granted by the Town Law and the following powers:
| |||||||
**Webmasters Note: The previous sections, 259.A through 267.D., have been amended as per Supplement No. 42. | |||||||
(1) Variance powers (matters of appeal to the Board of Appeals). Where there are practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships in the way of carrying out the strict letter of these regulations, the Board of Appeals shall have power to vary or modify the application of such regulations so that the spirit of this ordinance shall be observed, public safety and welfare secured and substantial justice done.
| |||||||
(a) Where any subdivision or lot reapportionment or site plan is the subject of an application for a variance, the Board of Zoning Appeals shall review the application for the purpose of considering the preservation of existing trees on the site. The application shall contain a specific plan, filed with the Department of Buildings, containing a tree legend which will identify by number, species and caliper (four inches or more) those trees to be preserved, removed and/or replaced. In reviewing the application, the Board of Zoning Appeals shall consider the following criteria: [Effective 10-18-1987]
| |||||||
[1] The condition of the trees with respect to disease and danger of falling, proximity to existing or proposed structures and interference with utility services.
| |||||||
[2] The necessity of the removal or alteration of the tree in question.
| |||||||
[3] Compliance with regulations of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and the Town of Hempstead Department of Conservation and Waterways if the proposed tree removal or alteration site is adjacent to freshwater wetland boundaries.
| |||||||
[4] The character established at the proposed site of removal or alteration with respect to existing tree density.
| |||||||
[5] The impact of any removal or alteration upon existing screening of any road or highway bordering the property.
| |||||||
[6] The recommendations of the Department of Buildings, which shall review the site plan for tree preservation with a landscape architect.
| |||||||
(2) Special powers and rules (matters of original jurisdiction and by application to the Board of Appeals). Whenever a use, or the location thereof, is permitted only if the Board of Appeals shall approve thereof, the Board of Appeals may, in a specific case and after notice and public hearing, authorize such permissive use and its location within the district in which this ordinance specifies the permissive use may be located, subject, however to the following:
| |||||||
(a) Before such approval shall be given, the Board of Appeals shall determine that:
| |||||||
[1] The use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of adjacent properties or of properties in adjacent use districts;
| |||||||
[2] The use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of permitted or legally established uses in the district wherein the proposed use is to be located or of permitted or legally established uses in adjacent use districts;
| |||||||
[3] The safety, the health, the welfare, the comfort, the convenience or the order of the Town will not be adversely affected by the proposed use and its location; and
| |||||||
[4] The use will be in harmony with and promote the general purposes and intent of this ordinance.
| |||||||
(b) In making such determination, the Board of Appeals shall also give consideration, among other things, to:
| |||||||
[1] The character of the existing and probable development of uses in the district, and the peculiar suitability of such district for the location of any of such permissive uses.
| |||||||
[2] The conservation of property values and the encouragement of the most appropriate uses of land.
| |||||||
[3] The effect that the location of the proposed use may have upon the creation of undue increase of vehicular traffic congestion on public streets, highways or waterways.
| |||||||
[4] The availability of adequate and proper public or private facilities for the treatment, removal or discharge of sewage, refuse or effluent (whether liquid, solid, gaseous or otherwise) that may be caused or created by or as a result of the use.
| |||||||
[5] Whether the use, or materials incidental thereto or produced, may give off obnoxious gases, odors, smoke or soot.
| |||||||
[6] Whether the use will cause disturbing emission of electrical discharges, dust, light, vibration or noise.
| |||||||
[7] Whether the operations in pursuance of the use will cause undue interference with the orderly enjoyment by the public of parking or of recreational facilities, if existing, or if proposed by the Town or by other competent governmental agency.
| |||||||
[8] The necessity for bituminous-surfaced space for purposes of off-street parking of vehicles incidental to the use, and whether such space is reasonably adequate and appropriate and can be furnished by the owner of the plot sought to be used within or adjacent to the plot wherein the use shall be had.
| |||||||
[9] Whether a hazard to life, limb or property because fire, flood, erosion or panic may be created by reason of or as a result of the use or by the structures to be used therefor or by the inaccessibility of the property or structures thereon for the convenient entry and operation of fire and other emergency apparatus or by the undue concentration or assemblage of persons upon such plot.
| |||||||
[10] Whether the use or the structures to be used therefor will cause an overcrowding of land or undue concentration of population.
| |||||||
[11] Whether the plot area is sufficient, appropriate and adequate for the use and the reasonable anticipated operation and expansion thereof.
| |||||||
[12] The physical characteristics and topography of the land.
| |||||||
[13] Whether the use to be operated is unreasonably near to a church, school, theater, recreational area or other place of public assembly.
| |||||||
[14] In applications for special exceptions for dish-type satellite signal receiving antennas, the Board of Zoning Appeals, in addition to the foregoing, shall also give consideration to the following [Effective 12-16-1983]:
| |||||||
[a] Whether a hazard to life, limb or property because of snow, wind or storm may be created by reason of or as a result of the installation of such antenna.
| |||||||
[b] Whether a hazard to life, limb or property because of structural impairment, disassembly or collapse may be created by reason of or as a result of the installation of such antenna.
| |||||||
[c] Whether solar access may be denied to an abutting property by reason of or as a result of the installation of such antenna.
| |||||||
[15] In applications seeking permissive uses, the Board of Zoning Appeals shall give consideration to the preservation of existing trees on the site. An application for a permissive use shall contain a specific plan, filed with the Department of Buildings, containing a tree legend which will identify by number, species and caliper (four inches or more), those trees to be preserved, removed and/or replaced. In reviewing the application, the Board of Zoning Appeals shall consider the following criteria; [Effective 10-18-1987]
| |||||||
[a] The condition of the tree with respect to disease and danger of falling, proximity to existing or proposed structures and interference with utility services.
| |||||||
[b] The necessity of the removal or alteration of the tree in question.
| |||||||
[c] Compliance with regulations of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and the Town of Hempstead Department of Conservation and Waterways if the proposed tree removal or alteration site is adjacent to freshwater wetland boundaries.
| |||||||
[d] The character established at the proposed site of removal or alteration with respect to existing tree density.
| |||||||
[e] The impact of any removal or alteration upon existing screening of any road or highway bordering the property.
| |||||||
[f] The recommendations of the Department of Buildings, which shall review the site plan for tree preservation with a landscape architect.
| |||||||
(c) Each application under this Subsection B shall be accompanied by a plot plan prepared by a registered architect, a licensed professional engineer or licensed surveyor, showing the location of each structure proposed to be erected on the plot which is the subject of said application and showing the dimensions of each such structure. The granting by the Board of Appeals of any such application shall be limited to structures of the dimensions shown on said plan and located as shown thereon unless the determination of said Board making such grant shall expressly provide otherwise. In making such determination where the application is for a mother-daughter permissive use, the Board of Appeals shall also give consideration, in addition to the foregoing, to:
| |||||||
[1] The criteria set forth in § 85-3 of Chapter 85 of the Code of the Town of Hempstead. [Effective 12-24-1973]
| |||||||
[2] Recommendation of the Board of Architectural Review made thereunder. [Effective 12-24-1973]
| |||||||
(d) As conditions to the granting of a mother-daughter application, the following shall be required by the Board of Zoning Appeals:
| |||||||
[1] That a restrictive covenant shall be submitted to the Board of Zoning Appeals and filed with the Nassau County Clerk's office at the applicant's expense, and which shall declare the limitations on the use of the mother-daughter residence in accordance with the determination of the Board of Zoning Appeals.
| |||||||
[2] That the Town of Hempstead shall have the right to inspect the premises during reasonable hours to ascertain whether the use is in compliance with the determination of the Board of Zoning Appeals. The applicant shall execute the consent for such inspection to be filed with the Town Clerk.
| |||||||
[3] Special exception grant for mother-daughter shall be terminated upon the happenings of the following events:
| |||||||
[a] Sale or lease of the mother-daughter premises.
| |||||||
[b] Any change of occupancy of the mother-daughter premises from that occupancy approved by the subject exception grant. [Effective 12-24-1973]
| |||||||
[4] As a part of the application, the resident owner/applicant for a mother-daughter residence shall provide to the Board of Appeals a photo ID acceptable to the Board of each person who the resident owner/applicant proposes to be entitled, by reason of familial relationship, to reside (with his or her family) at a second separate living unit within the dwelling. The resident owner/applicant shall disclose to the Board his or her familial relationship to each such person, and shall provide such proof of identity and familial relationship as the Board may demand. Any person whose necessary information as required above has not been submitted to, and approved by, the Board of Appeals shall not be a person whose residence at the premises constitutes qualification for mother-daughter residence status, regardless of familial relationship to the resident owner/applicant, pending further application to, and approval by, the Board of Appeals, if any. If at any point no fee resident owner and/or approved qualifying relative shall be a permanent resident of his or her respective dwelling unit, the mother daughter residence status shall immediately terminate, without need of further action by the Board of Appeals or any other instrumentality of the Town. In such case, the occupancy of the dwelling by a second family and maintenance of a second kitchen shall both become immediate and continuous nonpermitted uses in the district where they are situated, unless and until they are abated. The term "permanent resident" shall mean a person who actually resides at the premises in excess of 186 days per year; excepting active federal military duty. [Effective 4-21-2009]
| |||||||
(3) The Board of Appeals shall, in authorizing such permissive uses, impose such conditions and safeguards as it may deem appropriate, necessary or desirable to preserve and protect the spirit and objectives of this ordinance.
| |||||||
§ 268. Rules for filing appeals and applications.
| |||||||
The Board of Appeals shall make rules as to the manner of filing appeals and applications for variances or for special exceptions. | |||||||